From: markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de>
  To  : <masqmail@marmaro.de>
  Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 08:49:32 +0200

Re: [masqmail] masqmail-0.3.0 released

[2010-07-24 02:54] Matthias Matousek <matthias.matousek@uni-ulm.de>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:10:36PM +0200, markus schnalke wrote:
> > I'm glad to announce a new release of masqmail.
> >
> >     Version 0.3.0
> >
> > http://marmaro.de/prog/masqmail/files/masqmail-0.3.0.tar.gz
> >
> >
> > Note: This is the first release of the 0.3 development branch; expect
> > things to change in arbitrary ways in the next releases. If you want
> > to stay save, stay with the stable 0.2 branch.
> 
> Are there any suggestions how I should handle the arch linux package? A
> second one for 0.3 development branch?

Thanks for the question.

I still keep 0.2.x in Debian and suggest that other distributors
behave similar. The next releases in the 0.3 branch will probably
break further compatibility to 0.2 versions and also compatibility to
0.3.0. If you create a package for 0.3.0 now, you'll have to handle
this. At least in Debian you have to ensure save upgrades. If your
distribution doesn't require that you care for save upgrades then it
might be worth to create a 0.3.0 package.

Remember that 0.3.0 removed several functions that 0.2.x had and
hardly adds new functions.

For people who already use masqmail-0.2, it seems to be best to stay
with it for the near future. For new users, masqmail-0.3 is the better
choice. (It's much easier to set up and is better documented.)


meillo