From: Grzegorz Adamiak <gadamiak@docucollab.com>
  To  : <masqmail@marmaro.de>
  Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 09:41:08 +0200

Re: [masqmail] Reply-To header

--- markus schnalke [2009-05-26 22:44]:
> So, I don't need to but MAY provide the header. About its usage:
> 
> 	When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it indicates the address(es)
> 	to which the author of the message suggests that replies be sent.
> 
> There are reasons to not provide the header. See:
> 
> 	http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> 
> In `mutt', which I use, it's easy to distinguish the kind of reply:
> `L' for reply to list; `r' for reply to sender.
> 
> There are lists that do it this way and ones that do it the other way.
> I'd like to keep the behavior like it is (= no Reply-To header).

I'm using Thunderbird and have to change the recipient manually with 
every reply. In The Bat!, which I've been using for few years, I could 
easily remap headers, subjects etc. per folder. Don't know is that 
possible in TB. Anyway, I can handle this.

-- Grzegorz